 |
DESCRIPTION
About Digital Camera RAW Compatibility Update 2.5
This update extends RAW file compatibility for Aperture 2, iPhoto '08, and iPhoto '09 for the following cameras:
It also addresses issues related to specific cameras and overall stability.
WHAT'S NEW
Version 2.6: This update extends RAW image compatibility for Aperture 2, iPhoto 08, and iPhoto 09 for the following cameras:
- Canon EOS 500D
- Canon Rebel T1i
- Canon EOS Kiss Digital X3
- Nikon D5000
- Olympus E-30
REQUIREMENTS
Mac OS X 10.4.11 or Mac OS X 10.5.3 or later, Aperture 2 or iPhoto 7.1.2 or later.

|
|
|
 |
|  |
 | |  |
| Apple Digital Camera RAW Compatibility Update User Reviews (13 posts) | Write A Review |
 | Mar 4 2009 |
RC And I repeat myself..... still no support for the Panasonic LX-3. I understand that Apple has no obligation to support ANY camera and that the problem is rumored to be with Panasonic (barrel correction issue) but come on! This is probably in the top 3 P&S cameras used by pros not to mention serious hobbyists. The R-1Dx is not even released and probably will not see as heavy penetration as the LX-3 and yet it is already supported. Come on Apple, show Panny some love.... : ) (Version 2.5) | |
| [ 4 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jun 4 2009 |
RON BELL At this point, I've given up on Apple's providing support for the LX-3, which Adobe has supported for quite some time now. (Version 2.6) | |
 | Jun 4 2009 |
KMARCUS Look, if enough people stop supporting Apple products (iPhoto and Aperture) and support Adobe instead. Maybe they will get the hint and support the Panasonic products. There are probably more people using Panasonic's than most of the other cameras. I for one, will not support Apple until they support Panasonic Raw file. My money goes to Adobe in the mean time. (Version 2.6) | |
 | Jun 4 2009 |
MARSVIOLET You should try being a Sigma owner. Apple doesn't support ANY Sigma cameras. At all. Adobe does. So be it. (Version 2.6) | |
 | Jun 5 2009 |
RC Still no Panasonic DMC-LX3 Support? Fed Up...... Lightroom here I come. (Version 2.6) | |
 | Mar 2 2009 |
FOULGER I installed it today and the install went well but it knocked my Safari beta 4 preferences for 6 - had to reconfigure (Version 2.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Mar 2 2009 |
CHRIS FAM Wow, it even included the not-release-yet Epson R-D1x !!! Good job Apple (Version 2.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 27 2008 |
AAG It's abysmal that to install this patch improving core platforms functionality (e.g. ability to preview raw files in Finder), Apple requires to have one of the paid products (iLife or Aperture) to be installed. All of the Microsoft bashers don't have anything to say about it? If MS did something like this, it'd be all over forums. (Version 2.4) | |
| [ 4 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Mar 2 2009 |
D9 Considering the camera companies themselves don't include software compatible with Macs to handle RAW files, I'd say that's the proverbial "kettle calling the pot black." Since Apple sells iPhoto and Aperture, they're only obligated to enhance such software...not camera manufacturers' software. (Version 2.5) | |
 | Mar 2 2009 |
AAG You're contradicting yourself. Yes, Apple is only obligated to upgrade iPhoto and Aperture. But iPhoto is a part of the OS, is it not? Again, imagine MS decided that to use the latest and greatest Win Media Player, you'd have to pay $100 (which is roughly the cost of iLife, afaik). IMO, Apple can't have it both ways. If iPhoto is part of the OS, it should be upgraded to support new formats. If iPhoto is a standalone app, that somehow ends up bundled with the OS, where are all the people that wanted to sue MS for including the IE as part of the Win95? (Version 2.5) | |
 | Mar 2 2009 |
FOLLEREC I think you're confused. iPhoto is bundled with Macs, yes. But iPhoto isn't integrated into Mac OS X. You get it for free when you get a Mac. IE is bundled with Windows, yes. It is also integrated into Windows as part of the operating system. Here's something you can try... delete iPhoto. Move it to the Trash. Empty your Trash. Reboot. Your OS still works? Good. Now if you want iPhoto back, reinstall it from your restore discs that come with your Mac. No need to reinstall. Just install iPhoto. Now try this... uninstall IE. I mean not just using the "Set Program Access and Defaults" thing. Use the "Add or Remove Programs" in Control Panel. Well? Anyway, what was your problem again? Ah, updating things to be able to preview RAW in Finder... are you talking about thumbnails or QuickLook? If QuickLook, ask your camera manufacturer to develop the QuickLook plugin for their format. Or try to look for something generic, maybe UFRaw QuickLook plugin. For thumbnails... I don't think it's Apple's responsibility to generate thumbnails for all possible formats in Finder, especially if the main application for the format isn't installed. That's just me. You don't have to agree with me. (Version 2.5) | |
 | Mar 2 2009 |
CHAS_M To put it mildly, you're a bit confused. 1. RAW is not a universal format -- there are different types of RAW (many, actually). Apple's products and OS both ship with the ability to read the most common RAW files, but manufacturers keep changing/tweaking the format, requiring (FREE!) updates. 2. iPhoto is only a "paid" product if you're somehow not using a Mac. It's included on all Mac hardware. Upgrades are "paid" products, however. 3. Apple is under NO legal obligation to provide compatibility for these additional, new RAW formats -- this should properly be the responsibility of the maker of these formats, usually the camera manufacturers themselves. They should provide compatibility for both major platforms (as well as Linux, but as there's no money in doing so I can kind of see why they don't). But because Apple wants professional photographers to use the Mac platform, they provide compatibility at their own expense *as a courtesy.* Finally, if you want QuickLook capability for the various RAW formats, you'll have to talk to the manufacturers -- Apple can't provide everything for what amounts to a teeny tiny percentage of its customers. (Version 2.5) | |
 | Dec 18 2008 |
GAVIN CUTSHALL I hope that Apple will eventually find a way to install these minor updates without the need to reboot. I know it's a lame complaint, but when I update Safari on my work Windows XP machine, it can manage to do the job without the need to interrupt everything you are working on. (Version 2.4) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Mar 2 2009 |
D9 Yep, lame complaint. (Version 2.5) | |
 | Dec 18 2008 |
SCOTTYO In your Requirements section, it might be worth mentioning that it requires Aperture 2 or iPhoto 7.1.2 or newer. Could save a lot of unnecessary and disappointing downloads. And questions on the forums. I wish Apple would note the REAL requirements instead of just "10.4.11 or 10.5.3 or later" (Version 2.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 18 2008 |
RC Still no Panasonic Lumix LX3 ?...... (Version 2.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 18 2008 |
KBEAT Very nice! G10 on Aperture here I come. (Version 2.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 4 2008 |
COVMASTER ooh, bummer. Apple you just took too long to get that D90 support out. While waiting for it, I tried out Lightroom and learned what a better application it is over Aperture 2. Nice to see support for the newest cameras, but I've already been persuaded the other way. (Version 2.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 16 2008 |
RC PHOTO No support for the Nikon D90. Let's hope it is updated again soon! (Version 2.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
|
| View all 13 posts >> |
|